When I look at Tesla one thing that stands out to me is how big it's vision is. This is admirable - we do all like ambitious companies after all - but what subsequently puzzles me about Tesla is it's approach to that ambition. More specifically, the amount it allocates to be spent on research and development. To explain my point, let's have a meander through the car world to gather up some rough financial comparisons between manufacturers. At the base of the tree you have your upstart luxury car manufacturers like Aston Martin - and Aston Martin spend a plucky $450-550m a year on R&D in their bid to play a role in the luxury part of the market. The cars that result are pretty, but only serve part of a small part of the wider market. And even within the luxury car segment there are levels - and the top spot within that segment is held by The Daddy of the luxury car market - Ferrari. With a market cap of $76b and an R&D spend of about $1bn, Ferrari have always reaped ...
At the moment there is a lot of chatter in the news about financial markets with a lot of headlines along the lines of 'Is there a crash coming?' or 'Are we all going to die in some great financial fireball?'. And to be honest, I find these articles a bit tedious, because as soon as the news starts to be dominated by these articles, people start sending me links to them with comments along the lines of 'this is really important'. And when I start to be a bit dismissive, they start to get upset, because the information in these links 'IS REALLY IMPORTANT!!!' But for two quite different reasons, I don't think that the information included is very important. The first is because it is rarely very clear what to do with the information. And indeed I suspect that most of the reflexive responses, such as pivoting to gold, will in the long run prove to be ball calls, made more in panic than based upon any real insight about any given situation. But the secon...